GUAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY

REMEDIATION PLAN

FY2007

 

 

 

“As per Guam Public Law 28-150, Chapter II, Part IV, Section 5, “Remediation of Poor Collection Rates.   Within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this Act, the Administrator of the Guam Memorial Hospital Authority shall transmit to I Maga’lahen Guåhan and the Speaker of I Liheslaturan Guåhan a plan for remediation of the poor collection rates experienced by the Authority.  Said plan shall address such items as self-paying and non-paying customers, methods to improve collections from MIP, unfavorable settlement rates with insurance providers and poor reimbursement rates from Medicare.”

 

The Hospital in response to the above cited Guam Public Law, presents the following comprehensive “Collection Improvement Plan”.

 

 

SELF PAY

Over the past three fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Hospital has had Self Pay patients be a leading segment of total patient seen at the Hospital.  The estimated remaining types of patients (70%) have medical coverage, citing their employer, the federal government, local government, or private entity as being the intermediary for the coverage. 

                                                                       

Fiscal Years[1]                 Total Census                 Number of Self Pay                   %

            FY03                              47,415                                      15,837                                                 33

FY04                              44,152                                      16,200                                                37       

            FY05                              41,770                                      15,940                                                38

            FY06                              43,423                                      12,727                                                29

 

These numbers can easily translate into approximately twenty million dollars ($20M) in billings in a single fiscal year for self pay alone. (The Hospital bills over one hundred million dollars ($100M) in a single fiscal year or approximately nine million dollars ($9M) a month).    

 

Through experience, the Hospital has come to understand a Self Pay patient as being possibly identified as an:

 

1.                Individual who does not qualify for government provided insurance due to their income surpassing the minimum income standard but at the same time is unable to financially afford the health insurance provided by their employer.

 

2.                Individual who does qualify for government sponsored insurance but is pending receipt of an insurance card.

 

3.                Individual who does have health insurance but has not met their deductible for the qualifying insurance period.

 

4.                Individual whose health insurance provider has been billed and payment received by the Hospital.  The remaining balance on the bill has been identified by the health insurance provider as being a non-covered benefit.

 

5.                Individuals who do qualify for government provided insurance but is unaware of or has not pursued such health coverage. 

 

NOTE:        The Hospital has addressed such patients with the inception of the Medicaid Specialist situated in Patient Registration in November 2004.  All Self Pay patients are contacted by the Medicaid Specialist for possible qualification.  The Medicaid Specialist works with the patient by providing the applications, assisting them in filling out the application, obtaining an appointment at the Department of Public Health & Social Services (DPHSS), and in extreme cases, delivering the application to DPHSS for the applicant.  If approved, the patient would provide the valid coverage card to the Medicaid Specialist.  The Hospital would then bill the appropriate government provided insurance.

 

It must be clearly stated that the Hospital is not in the position to determine at the time of registration:

-                   If the patient is providing inaccurate or incorrect patient demographics (phone number, address, etc.).  Information provided by the patient is assumed and taken to be true and correct at the time that it is requested and given.

-                   The financial ability of the patient or guarantor to or not to render payment.  Notwithstanding this fact, the Hospital staff will in no way coerce the patient in rendering payment at the point of registration or discharge.  The Hospital staff will work with the patient or guarantor.

 

The above facts have not deterred the staff of Patient Registration from performing collection calls to the patients.  Collection calls are all performed within the guise of the Fair Debt Collection Act, such as:

-                   Collection calls are done between 8am and 9pm;

-                   Hospital staff is not allowed to misrepresent themselves, the Hospital, or the amount outstanding;

-                   Hospital staff is not allowed to use threatening, offensive, or vulgar language while conversing with the patient and/or guarantor.

 

Results of collection calls are placed into the Hospital’s Information System patient notes for documentation.

 

Collection calls are made three to five days after the patient has been discharged.  The time lapse is to allow the Hospital’s Information System to properly identify and capture all related patient charges and ensure the totality of the patient medical record.

 

NOTE:  The Hospital currently collects approximately four and one half million to five million dollars ($4.5M to $5M) a month towards Self Pay accounts. 

 

As been the practice of previous years, the Hospital, in conjunction with the Department of Revenue and Taxation via a Memorandum of Understanding, has successfully identified and referred over fifty one million dollars ($51M) worth of Hospital accounts for tax garnishment.  The assertion is that those owing the Hospital would expectantly receive a tax refund.  In that event, the tax refund would be directed to the Hospital to offset the amount owed. 

 

 

Finally, the Hospital is exploring the possibility of the possible garnishment of the COLA recipients.  Initial inquiries have proven that such efforts would be unsuccessful.  The matter has been referred to the Hospital’s legal counsel for further research.  In the mean time the Hospital has obtained a listing of the COLA recipients to determine the likelihood of any having an outstanding account with the Hospital. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEE ATTACHED ACTION PLAN FOR IMPROVING COLLECTION FROM SELF PAY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNFAVORABLE SETTLEMENT RATES FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES

 

The relationship between the Hospital and the local insurance providers is symbiotic in nature.  Both are conversely in need of each other in order to fulfill their intended mission.  The insurance companies need to have a venue available to provide quality medical care to their members and the Hospital is legally mandated to provide quality medical care to all. 

 

Historically, the Hospital and local insurance companies have managed to negotiate contractual allowance that amounts to 8% of total billing.  This 8% represents an amount that is taken from the gross billed amount.  It has served as an incentive for insurance companies to provide payment to the Hospital outside the scope of the negotiated contract (contract terms allow for the insurance companies to render payment on the 1st and 15th of every month).  Because of the 8%, insurance companies have been rendering payment on a weekly basis.  This has significantly improved the cash flow of the Hospital.  The Hospital would be enduring financial hardship if the payments from the insurance companies resorted to only twice a month (24 times a year) as opposed to weekly (52 times a year).

 

The contract between the Hospital and insurance companies involves many layers of wants and needs.  Prime examples of this convoluted relationship are as follows:

-                   The insurance companies need access to patient medical records in order to determine the medical necessity of services rendered.  The Hospital in turn needs to ensure that each patient medical record is complete and fully documents the patient’s medical situation.  Their members also have a vested interest in ensuring that their medical stay is documented.  Services that are determined to be a medically non-necessity will be borne by their member. 

-                   The Hospital also needs to be able to properly identify the insurance members in order to properly bill their insurance provider.  The insurance companies need the Hospital to perform this function 100% of the time in order for their members to receive non payment on their Hospital accounts. 

-                   The timely remittance and recognition of Hospital claims to the insurance provider is also in consideration.  At times the issue of whether or not Hospital claims were billed and received by the insurance provider becomes an issue.  Insurance companies have been working towards enabling the Hospital to remit claims electronically.    

The Hospital is looking to negotiate for FY08 health insurance contracts beginning March 08 of next year.  Both parties are looking forward to addressing such concerns and the continuance of the current contractual allowance.  The Hospital hopes to conclude negotiations well before the beginning of the next fiscal year which would greatly assist the overall Government of Guam Health negotiations for that fiscal year. 

 

Overall the Hospital is working towards improving its delivery of service to the insurance companies.  Such efforts would place the Hospital in a better negotiating position with the insurance companies.  The Hospital is cognizant that additional measures need to be determined and accomplished but prudently done in increments.

 

-                   The Hospital is system capable to transmit claims and receive payments electronically.  The Hospital is waiting for the insurance companies to be compliant.  Claims would be screened via a required clearinghouse to ensure that the information being transmitted is clean and within preset claim format.  Transmission and receipt would be instantaneous and documented.  An important portion of this capability would enable the Hospital to correct and resubmit the corrected claims electronically.  Lastly, payment would also be submitted electronically into the identified Hospital’s bank account and reflective in the Hospital’s Information System.  All time saving and a cost savings to both parties involved. 

-                   Migration towards a paperless environment.  The effect would be an almost immediate receipt of the Protected Health Information (PHI) by the intended insurance provider.  The challenge would be full funding of the comprehensive project and the development of a complete infiltration plan that would encompass the myriad of Hospital internal systems.  Partial funding has been identified and the Hospital is reviewing the various paperless options available.  The Hospital is looking at implementing the paperless environment in incremental steps.  The first department to realize the benefits of paperless is slated to be Medical Records.  The Hospital would also look at how to incorporate its Information system provider, Keane to ensure computer system compatibility.

-                   The Hospital is also working towards improving quality and integrity of patient claims with the reimplementation of the Post Discharge Review that was initially initiated during the FY03 fiscal year.  This process enabled the Hospital to perform a medical/utilization review of claims prior to the transmission of the claim to the intended insurance provider.  Unfortunately, a loss of staff resulted in the stoppage of the process.  This again would be a comprehensive effort by a number of Hospital departments, Utilization Review, Medical Records, and Patient Affairs.  Clean claims will shorten the reimbursement period of claims as the insurance companies will have the opportunity to question its validity or veracity.

 

The Hospital has made great advances in clarifying aged unpaid claims.  The Hospital has worked diligently in providing requested data and documentation in order for the insurance companies to render payment as opposed to settling.  The Hospital has assigned a staff who is responsible to work directly with the local insurance companies in “cleaning” out outstanding claims.  Both the insurance companies and the Hospital have developed a mutual arrangement in the transmission of PHI.  Insurance representatives are able to access PHI for their clients either by directly reviewing the PHI or having the information scanned to a secure site via a secured line.  This is a vast improvement to the previous arrangements of the Hospital making copies of their client’s PHI and physically transmitting such PHI to their office. 

 

 

 

 SEE ATTACHED ACTION PLAN FOR IMPROVING UNFAVORABLE INSURANCE SETTLEMENT RATES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POOR REIMBURSEMENT RATES FROM MEDICARE

 

The Hospital is Medicare certified and thus is able to bill and receive payment for Medicare patients.  Bear in mind that although the Hospital is reimbursed on a fee for service basis (impinged by the Tax Relief and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA), Medicare charges are reimbursed on a per diem basis.  This per diem rate is determined on the results of the annual Medicare Cost report that must be filed five (5) months after the close of the fiscal year the Cost report is being submitted for.  The Cost report can be equated to that of the Hospital’s tax return.  The Cost report is a report card of how the Hospital operates, looking at usage of space, how the hospital captures and records expenditures, physician time studies, and more recently, the amount of bad debts the Hospital has acquired. The Hospital receives notice from Medicare of the official reimbursement rate for that particular fiscal year for all realized claims for that year. 

 

It should be noted that Medicare patients do not have a deductible or patient share.  The residual, after payment from Medicare has been received, is recognized contractual allowance. 

 

To improve reimbursement rates from Medicare would signify a long term plan encompassing all of the Hospital’s internal working systems – medical and administrative.  As the Hospital is committed towards attaining Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) recognition such encompassing plans is in the works.  JCAHO is an independent, not-for-profit organization that maintains state-of-the-art standards that focus on improving the quality and safety of care provided by health care organizations. The Joint Commission’s comprehensive accreditation process evaluates an organization’s compliance with these standards and other accreditation requirements.

 

The Hospital has many ongoing projects that would all culminate in the improvement of both services and the collection of such services.  As mentioned in the plan, the Hospital is geared in the direction of JCAHO accreditation and concurrently, GMHA is currently working with the US Department of Interior Consultants to develop a Financial Management Improvement Plan (FMIP).  The consultants began to develop the Financial Improvement Plan (FMIP) in February 2006.  Governor Camacho sent a letter to the Department of Interior requesting assistance for the Hospital.  The Governor’s request was made in conjunction with a request from the Office of the Public Auditor.  The Department of Interior and the USDA Graduate School have previously provided assistance to Guam’s departments of Revenue and Tax, Administration and Public School System. 

 

The goal of a Financial Management Improvement Plan is to help GMHA’s management identify areas for improvement and implement needed solutions.  A Financial Management Improvement Plan will look at all aspects of the hospital including medical and business services.   The consultants have made three onsite visits to the Hospital providing guidance as required.  The FMIP process is one that the Hospital and its employees are to take ownership.  The consultants are only that, consultants.  They provide guidance and steer the in-house FMIP core group in the direction that can be achieved.   The in-house FMIP core group has had a recent set back as the assigned FMIP director resigned from the Hospital.  A replacement has been identified and has resumed progress.

 

 

SEE ATTACHED ACTION PLAN FOR POOR REIMBURSEMENT RATES FROM MEDICARE

 

 

 

 

METHODS TO IMPROVE COLLECTIONS FROM MIP

 

Guam P.L. 27-30, §2916 tied the reimbursement rate the Hospital receives for MIP patient charges to that of the prevailing Medicare per diem rate.   Although MIP patients do have a deductible and/or patient share, numerous times, they are unable to render payment.  If it has been adjudicated by DPHSS that rendered medical services are inappropriate or deemed non-emergency in nature, the financial burden is passed on to the patient.  Thus, the remaining balance becomes uncollectible.  Add to the fact that many of the MIP clients use the Hospital’s emergency room instead of the Public Health clinics as they are seen by the physician quicker or the clinic is closed and they do not want to wait until the next day.  The Hospital would bill for the services but the Department of Public Health and Social Services (DPHSS) would deem the charges as being non emergency in nature and deny the claim.  The MIP client, as informed at the point of registration that they would be ultimately responsible for the bill if payment is not rendered by MIP, would be billed for the services but unable to make payment.   The Hospital does have the option of referring the account to a collection agency but in reality, it would be ineffective as the patient does not have the means to render payment.  Sending the delinquent account to the collection agency would prolong the life of the account until it is either determined to be uncollectible or payment has been solicited. 

 

The problem in collecting from MIP is not with the billing process.  The claims are regularly sent to DPHSS (copious as evident in the boxes that are received by DPHSS on a daily basis).  DPHSS was experiencing a staffing shortage that had a direct impact on the inputting and payment of Hospital claims.  The Hospital, realizing that it would only behoove them to take action, has had a Hospital staff assigned at DPHSS to enter Hospital claims. The arrangement has had supplemental benefits for any questions on the claims can be corrected as they are being entered prior to the adjudication process. 

 

The Hospital proposes to reenact previous legislation that reimbursed the Hospital for bad debts to include delinquent MIP patient accounts.  The Hospital would compile such accounts that have not been paid and the patient has been determined unable to render payment and forward it to the Legislature.  The Legislature would then appropriate funds to reimburse the Hospital for the medical care that has been rendered towards MIP patients. 

 

An alternative to the Hospital receiving financial reimbursement for delinquent MIP accounts would be to have exchange of medical services for work services.  The MIP client may have administrative skills, carpentry skills, or grounds abilities that can be used to offset their Hospital bill.  The MIP client can work at the prevailing minimum wage.  No benefits would be recognized by the Hospital on behalf of the MIP client. 

 

Prospectively, to truly mitigate the growing health care needs of the indigent people is to educate them on proper healthcare.  The island may not be able to correct the healthcare problems of the adults, but if the education process is begun early enough, then the number of patients seen both the Hospital and the public health clinics would subside.   It can be mandated that all MIP clients attend health care and management classes.

 

 

SEE ATTACHED METHODS TO IMPROVE COLLECTIONS FROM MIP

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECAPITULATION

 

Conclusive long terms solutions that need to be considered are as follows:  (Long term can be defined in the following solutions as over a period of two to five years).

 

1.                Revisit Guam P.L. 23-22 mandating the manner in which the Hospital is able to price its services and supplies.  The Deloitte and Touche Pricing Model was legally adopted as the authorized method to price new services and supplies.  The legislature and the Hospital need to both look at more modern methods, methods that allow the Hospital to be flexible but realistic in how the Hospital can be allowed to determine the rate of reimbursement.  There are companies that are familiar with Hospital pricing schemes that are accessible via the internet.  Updates to the Hospital’s pricing model with appropriate Current Procedural Terminology codes (CPT) can be done with a simple download.  Currently updating of CPT codes is done manually.  Another service that would be available is the provision of average cost of services and supplies.  Such service would provide a base line of the minimum cost of the product.  The Hospital would have to take into consideration shipping costs in order to be comparable.  The point is the Hospital needs to revamp the manner in which costs are recovered.  The Hospital is tied to a model that is antiquated and archaic. 

 

2.                Allow the Hospital legislatively to procure its medical supplies competitively, outside the realm of the government of Guam procurement rules and regulations.  Many Hospitals abroad are members of a buying consortium and enjoy the profit of paying discounted prices due to the bulk purchasing theory.  The Hospital would be able to procure and receive items quicker as they are usually stored ready for shipment.  Being a government agency, the Hospital is inhibited in procuring items. Time becomes a factor in having the correct and proper medical supplies as required for the delivery of quality medical services. 

 

3.                Work with the Guam Delegate in excluding Guam from the TEFRA act.  At this time, Guam is the only Hospital that receives reimbursement for Medicare patients on a per diem basis.  (Per diem reimbursement = a daily rate.  Currently, the Hospital’s inpatient per diem rate is $767.00 per day if the Hospital bill is $1,000.00 for one day, the residual of contractual allowance).  All other health providers (other than on Guam) are on a Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) basis (A part of Medicare’s Prospective Payment System).  Hospitals receive reimbursement dependent upon the predetermined patient classification system.  Such patient classification system relates the types of patients and the resources that are consumed.  There are currently ten (10) DRGs, normal newborn, virginal delivery, heart failure, psychoses, cesarean section, neonate with significant problems, angina pectoris, specific cerebrovascular disorders, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement. 

Per the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), if the hospital treats a high-percentage of low-income patients, it receives a percentage add-on payment applied to the DRG-adjusted base payment rate. This add-on, known as the disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustment, provides for a percentage increase in Medicare payment for hospitals that qualify under either of two statutory formulas designed to identify hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients. For qualifying hospitals, the amount of this adjustment may vary based on the outcome of the statutory calculation.

 

 

The Hospital is cognizant of it’s need duty and obligation to be self sufficient and maintain financial stability.  In the same token, the reality of the cost of providing quality medical care is growing.  The Hospital is a working as efficiently with what precious resources are available.  The state of the island’s healthcare is changing which makes it very difficult for the Hospital to effectively have all the necessary medical services and supplies on hand.  The Hospital is appreciative of the assistance afforded by, the Legislature, the Governor, and the Federal Government.  The Hospital will continue to do it’s part and strive for advancement.

 

 

 

 

 

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



[1] Admission Listing for:

October 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003 – FY03

October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004 – FY04

October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2005 – FY05

October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006 – FY06

AS400 Report Reference: PIRP9002-001

Report represents the patient’s status (Financial class) at the time of Registration.